Coalition maths

According to Andrew Rawnsley, a hung parliament is quite a plausible outcome of the 2015 election. But how likely is it really compared to the 2010 election?

In 2010, a number of factors made a hung parliament a very likely outcome. The Conservatives were in the ascendant, but due to the geographical spread of their voters they required a larger poll lead than Labour in order to secure a majority. Using the Electoral Calculus model we can estimate the leads Labour and the Conservatives would have required to get a majority:


Labour Conservative Conservative lead Outcome
28 39 +11 Con majority 6
29 38 +9 Hung - Con short 11
30 37 +7 Hung - Con short 23
31 36 +5 Hung - Con short 40
32 35 +3 Hung - Lab short 37
33 34 +1 Hung - Lab short 24
34 33 -1 Hung - Lab short 15
35 32 -3 Lab majority 6

In the end, the Conservative lead was seven points and so they had to go into coalition with the Lib Dems. The Tories have since attempted to manipulate the electoral boundaries to benefit themselves, but the Lib Dems have said they will block the manoeuvre in revenge for the failure of House of Lords reform. So we will be in much the same position in 2015.

There is an assumption in the table above though that we have not yet considered: the Lib Dem share of the vote. One of the other reasons a hung parliament was so likely last time round was because the Lib Dems polled around 24%. At the moment, though, they are far less popular, with the likes of YouGov regularly putting them in single figures.

Let's be generous and assume that the Lib Dems will not do quite that badly - what does the table look like if the Lib Dems poll, say, 12%? (assuming the rest of their vote goes to either Labour of Conservative)

Labour Conservative Conservative lead Outcome
36 43 +7 Con majority 22
37 42 +5 Hung - Con short 6
38 41 +3 Hung - Con short 17
39 40 +1 Hung - Lab short 10
40 39 -1 Lab majority 6

Clearly a hung parliament is much less likely under these circumstances, even before taking into consideration Labour's current 10 point lead over the Tories.

This point may seem obvious but I suspect that many political pundits haven't figured it out yet.

Comments

  1. SpaceSquid25 September 2012 at 11:04

    We're getting dangerously close to that candidate in the West Wing who was within the margins of error of having any support at all.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What would a Labour Brexit look like?

Image
Some Remainers are upset at Jeremy Corbyn again, after he apparently ruled out staying in the single market after Brexit . Many have taken umbrage at his claim that single market membership is intrinsically linked to EU membership, pointing to the EFTA countries Norway, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Iceland as counterexamples. But Corbyn is technically correct to say that the single market is not a club that can be joined. You can of course loosely say that the likes of Norway and Switzerland are "in" the single market, but their high level of access comes through the EEA agreement and bilateral treaties respectively, which include exceptions such as agriculture and fisheries. It's not a binary distinction by any means. Rather than argue semantics, a more fruitful exercise is to analyse what Labour would actually hope to achieve if they were in charge of Brexit negotiations. As with the Conservatives , it is clear enough if you take at face value what they say t
Read more

Unseen Academicals and the meaning of sport

Image
There's nothing like a hardback book to make you wonder: "what's the point of hardback books?". They're more awkward to use and less portable than paperbacks, they take up more than their fair share of space, and they're expensive. They're grandiose relics, like stately homes in a world designed for suburban semis, except you don't even get a nice cup of tea and a slice of cake when you stump up for a hardback book. They'd be harmless, though, if it wasn't for the hardback-exclusivity of new books. This actually depresses total book sales, at least from me, because the media review books as soon as they come out, but if a review actually convinces me to buy, I then have to wait up to a year for it to come out in paperback, by which time I've forgotten all about it. And unless it makes the Waterstones 3-for-2, I'm unlikely to chance across it again. Nice work, publishers! The one advantage to hardbacks is that they are impressive.
Read more

Are Starmer's pledges worth the paper they were written on?

Image
  The 10 pledges made by Keir Starmer on his way to victory in the Labour leadership election planted his campaign firmly in the ground marked by the 2017 general election manifesto that almost put Corbyn's Labour into government. But six months on, questions are increasingly being asked about whether he intends to stand by them. On both the left and right wings of the party and among some commentators there is a growing belief that the pledges were nothing but a ruse to lure former Corbyn supporters away from his chosen successor Rebecca Long-Bailey, and having served their purpose are now in the process of being quietly dropped to make way for a return to Blair-style centrism.  But is this belief actually true? Approaching this question as a very forensic lawyer might do, let's first consider the case for the prosecution. The belief on the Labour right and among centrist pundits that Starmer is their man is well summed up by Andrew Rawnsley's  recent column on his confere
Read more